hmm, ty for help upgrader. I have changed my mind, and going for the E8400 becuase it can run all games ok out now with the 9800GTX, and can possibly still run future dx10 games in vista at a good level?
+ it has more
chipsets than the Q6600, 45 nanometer technology, and higher frontside bus 1333 MHz, dunno if these make any difference at all atm in terms of performance.
I'm not sure whether to go for vista now, or leave it until dx10 games get more popular. I can play crisis on dx9-XP
"The difference between DX9 and DX10 (in crysis) is better performance and a bit more detail. You want see too much visual difference. In later games you will however as DX10 hardware is released (as right now developers can't work in real-time on DX10 stuff)." Said by a creator of crisis. I plan to game in the future, do you think it is more beneficial to get the Q6600, encase the E8400 gets too little to help the 9800GTX power these better games?
I currently have no idea if the 9800GTX can run on a VGA connected screen- with a DVI to VGA converter?
The motherboard I am currently looking at is the
Asus P5KC, and I can see no conflicts with the currently selected hardware, and this one costs about £80. However I am looking for one that supports 2x nvidia cards, and not 2x ati ones, and keeping the ddr/or 3
ram setup on the board. I am very hopeful. This board supports 2xddr3 or up to 4x ddr2

If you can that would be great : D
again sorry about all of the questions, I started planning knowing nothing.
thanks, jake
